Feminine participation in cybercrime is much higher than for all kinds of crime, according to a new report which raises some appealing queries about possible gender bias in investigations.
Trend Micro used equipment studying web services Gender Analyzer V5 to review textual content published by 50 random buyers of the Russian-language XSS discussion board and 50 end users of the English-language Hackforums web page.
It unveiled that 30% of people XSS discussion board buyers ended up girls, mounting to 36% of Hackforums consumers.
“Our control team consisted of 10 aliases that posted their gender profiles on line and recognized by themselves as girls from XSS and Hackforums,” the report noted. “When we ran posts from these users by way of the textual content analyzer, final results indicated that all the aliases were labeled as woman with an regular classifier percentage of 82.4%.”
The report authors also utilised a independent AI device to verify the gender of cybercrime forum users. Semrush is billed as a look for engine advertising and marketing option. It uses machine studying algorithms to examine info from social networks and other 3rd-social gathering resources, in buy to identify the demographic data of web people, this sort of as gender.
Its investigation claimed an even higher proportion of dark web discussion board buyers were being females: 41% of XSS customers and 40% of Hackforums users.
By distinction, 4–8% of the jail population in the British isles, Russia and US is woman, according to information cited in the report.
If correct, the findings would also show that a bigger share of women participate in cybercrime than at this time get the job done in the cybersecurity sector. The newest estimates from ISC2 set this figure at close to 24%, even though it does rise to 30% in the beneath-30s.
Pattern Micro argued that the cybercrime financial state appears frequently welcoming of all people today as prolonged as they have the suitable abilities and working experience.
That really should be a reminder to investigators in no way to think a malicious actor’s gender, it concluded.
“It is our suggestion for all investigators to prevent assumptions of male personas although carrying out their operate (these kinds of as referring to a suspect as ‘he’ or ‘his’) as this results in an inherent bias as they development their circumstance,” the report pointed out.
“We advise alternatively to use ‘they,’ which will not only go over any gender involved, but also force investigators to variable in that much more than 1 individual may perhaps be behind a single moniker under investigation.”
Some parts of this article are sourced from: